week 1?The A7D Affair” Please respond to the following:Read…

week 1″The A7D Affair” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1152/BUS309_Case_Study_1.3.pdf”>Case 1.3: The A7D Affair, located here or on page 37 in your textbook. In the case study, Vandivier found his professional code of conduct, moral standards, and legal standards came into conflict with one another. Determine whether you believe Vandivier did the right thing or not, and either challenge or support his decision to write the qualification report. Propose one (1) alternative course of action Vandivier could have taken.week 2″Hacking Into Harvard” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1152/BUS309_Case_Study_2.1.pdf”>Case 2.1: Hacking into Harvard, located here or on page 71 in your textbook. As applicants began to defend themselves against the penalties handed out by the business schools, they appealed to both consequentialist and nonconsequentialist criteria to support their actions. Some responded by pointing out that their intentions were never malicious, while others argued they did not think checking their application statuses would cause any real harm. Review the case study and analyze the actions of the students from a Kantian perspective. Consider whether the actions taken by the hackers were permissible according the standard of universal acceptability.week 3″Battling Over Bottled Water” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1152/BUS309_Case_Study_3.2.pdf”>Case 3.2: Battling Over Bottled Water, located here or on page 109 in your textbook. Nestlé holds a 99-year lease for the land that the Sanctuary Spring sits on. While lease-holders are generally understood to be able to make full use of their land, when public resources are involved, they are limited to “reasonable uses.†Review the case study and formulate an argument either supporting or challenging this distinction. Support your reasoning by addressing key ways in which benefits and burdens are being distributed between Nestlé and the community in this case.week 4″One Nation under Walmart” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1148edit/BUS309_Case_Study_4.3.pdf”>Case 4.3: One Nation under Walmart, located here or on page 144 in your textbook. Next, choose two (2) of the five (5) discussion questions located at the end of the case. Formulate your response and post to the Week 4 discussion. Respond to a peer who answered at least one (1) different question than you did.week 5week 5″Hot Coffee at McDonald’s” Please respond to the following:Read Case 6.2: Hot Coffee at McDonald’s, located .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1148edit/BUS309_Case_Study_6.2.pdf”>here or on page 231 in your textbook. Next, watch the video titled, “Woman Burned by McDonald’s Hot Coffee, Then the News Media | Retro Report | The New York Times†(12 min 17 s), located below..youtube.com/watch?v=pCkL9UlmCOE” title=”Woman burned by mcdonald’s hot coffee, then the news media | retro report | the new york times”>.ytimg.com/vi/pCkL9UlmCOE/1.jpg” alt=””>Watch VideoWoman Burned by McDonald’s Hot Coffee, Then the News Media | Retro Report | The New York TimesDuration: (12:18)User: thenewyorktimes -Added: 10/21/13YouTube URL:.youtube.com/watch?v=pCkL9UlmCOE”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCkL9UlmCOEAfter reviewing the video and case study, choose two (2) of the five (5) discussion questions located at the end of the case. Formulate your response and post to the Week 5 discussion. Respond to a peer who answered at least one (1) different question than you did.week 6week 6″Poverty and Pollution” Please respond to the following”Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1148edit/BUS309_Case_Study_7.2.pdf”>Case 7.2: Poverty and Pollution, located here or on page 267 in your textbook. Next, predict the effects of pollution permits on poor, less-developed areas like Brazil’s “valley of death.” Assess the effectiveness of incentive programs on manufacturers in less-developed areas. Based on your assessment, provide an argument in support of either pollution permits or incentive programs.week 7Week 7 Discussion.strayer.edu/webapps/discussionboard/do/message?action=list_messages&forum_id=_2009290_1&nav=discussion_board&conf_id=_136006_1&course_id=_149847_1&message_id=_44456160_1#”>C”Speaking Out about Malt” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1152/BUS309_Case_Study_8.3.pdf”>Case 8.3: Speaking Out about Malt, located here or on page 311 in your textbook. Determine whether Mary acted irresponsibly or disloyally in your opinion. Describe the actions that you think Mary should take next. Explain what you would do if you were in Mary’s position.week 8″She Snoops to Conquer” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1152/BUS309_Case_Study_9.3.pdf”>Case 9.3: She Snoops to Conquer, located here or on page 346 in your textbook then respond to the following questions. Do employees have a right not to be spied on? If you were the owner of the store, how would you view Jean’s actions? How should the information that the security team gathered be handled?week 9″Ebola at Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital” Please respond to the following:Watch the video titled “Full interview: Matt Lauer and Dallas nurse Briana Aguirre†(17 min 25 s), located .today.com/video/today/56243958#56243958″>here. Next, respond to the following questions. Texas Presbyterian nurse Briana Aguirre who treated Ebola stricken colleagues announced publicly that her protective outfit had rips, as well as gaps in it – exposing body parts to the potentially deadly Ebola virus. She claimed that hospital administration ignored her concerns when she brought it to their attention, and she was given no Ebola training. Briana Aguirre has received praise from colleagues and the media for going public with this information, as well as harsh criticism for being a “whistleblower†from other colleagues and the media. In your opinion, did Briana Aguirre act ethically or unethically in going public with this information? Should she be fired from the Texas Presbyterian hospital? Support or challenge Briana Aguirre’s decision to go public with this information.week 10″Consenting to Sexual Harassment” Please respond to the following:Read .strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BUS/309/1148edit/BUS309_Case_Study_11.4.pdf”>Case 11.4: Consenting to Sexual Harassment, located here or on page 420 in your textbook then respond to the following questions. According to her own testimony, Vinson acquiesced to Taylor’s sexual demands. In this sense her behavior was “voluntary.†Does the voluntariness of her behavior mean she had “consented†to Taylor’s advances? Does it mean they were “welcomeâ€? Do you agree that Vinson’s acquiescence shows there was no sexual harassment? Defend your positionweek 11″Criminal Background Checks” Please respond to the following:Read the article titled, “Why Aren’t Business Ethics Classes Making Businesses More Ethical?â€, located .biola.edu/blog/2013/feb/13/why-ethics-classes-rae/”>here. Next, respond to the following questions. The Wall Street Journal recently announced that ethics courses are useless because ethics cannot be taught. Although few people would turn to the Wall Street Journal as a learned expert on the teaching of ethics, the issue raised by the newspaper is a serious one: Can ethics be taught? Do business ethics classes have value in the workplace? Defend your position..

 

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Hire our Top Uk Tutors while you enjoy your free time! All papers are written from scratch and are 100% Original. Try us today! Active Discount Code FREE15